Since I made this decision I have had several debates with people about it. Some of them think it's great. Some think it's quirky. Some think it is an artistic statement. Some think that it sucks because chicken tastes good. It's really interesting especially because I have never asked people whether or not they think I should eat chicken -- I just say that I don't eat it because I paint Ed and then they offer their 2 cents on the matter.
The last person I told this to explained to me that the chickens (we buy at the market) were dead anyway and so I should consume them and let them contribute to me and nourish me. I must say that this is one of the better reasons I've heard to continue eating chicken. But, it still feels strange in my heart to be painting Ed all the time and then go and eat chicken. It's like if Walt Disney ate duck (Donald). Who knows, maybe he did? It's like if Mel Blanks ate rabbit. Who knows, maybe he did?... Can you imagine them sitting there, drawing their characters, giving them voices, and leaning over and taking a bite of those animals? It seems off to me.
Regardless of what others have done in the past, it still feels like the right decision to me. It is one of respect -- respect for Ed, respect for my work, and respect for chickens. My culinary life has not suffered because of the chicken omission and my heart feels good. Having said that, I have no desire to create a cow character or a lobster character anytime soon...